SmartGadgetKit Review / Power Banks amazonCheck latest price

Review · Power banks · A1289

Anker 737 Power Bank Review (A1289): Still the 140W Benchmark?

This Anker 737 review looks at the A1289 model, the PowerCore 24K that was one of the first flight-safe packs to put a 140W USB-C socket in your bag and accept the same speed back. Three years after launch it is still a strong recommendation, but newer Anker banks have since raised the bar.

Written by Alisdair, network engineer With Darleene, everyday-use contributor Updated 26 September 2026

SmartGadgetKit is reader-supported. We may earn a commission if you buy through links on this page, at no extra cost to you. We only recommend gear we would carry ourselves.

ANKER / A1289 Anker 737 Power Bank (PowerCore 24K), model A1289, the subject of this review
Specs are verified against the manufacturer and Amazon listings; every performance figure comes from named independent testing, not a spec sheet. See our method ›

Expert Score

★★★★★

A flight-safe 86.4Wh pack that still puts a genuine 140W USB-C port in your bag, with a display that removes the guesswork. The 630g weight, 18W USB-A port and ageing platform keep it from a higher score.

Pros

  • Verified 140W single-port output under load in independent testing
  • 86.4Wh sits comfortably under the 100Wh airline carry-on ceiling
  • 1 to 1.5 hour self-recharge with a 140W wall charger, per independent testing
  • Smart display shows live wattage, battery health and cycle count

Cons

  • 630g is bag carry, not pocket carry
  • USB-A port is limited to 18W
  • Needs a 5A e-marked USB-C cable to see the full 140W
  • Anker’s Prime line has since raised the flagship bar

Key takeaways

Six numbers that decide whether this is your power bank

140WFrom one port. PD 3.1 with 28V/5A support still puts the 737 in the top tier of sub-100Wh banks in 2026.
1.5hSelf-recharge. 1 to 1.5 hours with a 140W wall charger, per independent testing. Most rivals need 2 hours or more.
86.4WhFlight safe. Comfortably under the 100Wh carry-on threshold, so it flies with you. Hand luggage only.
630gThe trade-off. This is a bag bank, not a pocket bank.
DisplayIt earns its keep. Live wattage in and out, battery health, cycle count.
5ACable matters. You need a 5A e-marked USB-C cable to see the full 140W. A standard 60W cable silently caps it.

Quick specs

The paper numbers for the Anker 737 Power Bank (PowerCore 24K)

Model numberA1289
Cell capacity24,000mAh / 86.4Wh
Max output140W (USB-C, PD 3.1)
Ports2x USB-C (140W), 1x USB-A (18W)
Recharge140W input, 1 to 1.5 hours
Weight630g
Dimensions155.7 x 54.6 x 49.5mm
DisplaySmart digital display
Warranty24 months

Specs confirmed against Anker’s official A1289 product page and the Amazon listing. See how we test and score.

First impressions

The 737 makes no attempt to hide what it is: a dense, glossy black brick with a screen. Pick it up and the 630g registers immediately. That heft bought something rare when it launched, and mostly still does: laptop-class charging that clears airport security without a second glance.

The screen is what wins people over. Most banks give you four LEDs and a guess. The 737 shows exactly how many watts are flowing in and out, the battery’s health percentage and its cycle count. If your laptop is charging slowly, the display tells you why before you have opened a settings menu.

In the box you get the bank, a short USB-C cable and the paperwork. There is no 140W wall charger included, so factor that in if you want the fastest self-recharge.

Design and build

A chunky brick format built around the screen and the 140W port

At 630g and 155.7 x 54.6 x 49.5mm, this is a pack you allocate space to. Anker publishes both figures on its A1289 product page, and the weight there is the product weight rather than a shipping weight, which is a distinction worth holding on to when comparing listings.

The chunky-brick format is a deliberate trade. Anker packed 24,000mAh and a 140W-capable board into a shape that stands upright on a desk, survives being thrown into a rucksack, and sheds heat through a solid shell rather than a slim one.

Two things to know before you buy. First, the display: left switched on permanently, the bank can drain roughly 15 percent in 24 hours just powering the screen, a behaviour Anker documents in its own product FAQ. Treat the display as a check-in tool rather than a permanent dashboard and standby drain is a non-issue.

Second, the USB-A port sits at 18W, which in 2026 makes it strictly a phone-and-earbuds port. Everything serious happens over USB-C.

Darleene, SmartGadgetKit contributor Darleene asks
“My phone charger is tiny and does the job. Why would I carry something this big and this powerful?”

Alisdair’s answer: because this is not a phone charger, it is a laptop’s wall plug in your bag. 140W refills a MacBook while you keep working, not just a phone overnight, and the 24,000mAh holds enough for a full laptop charge plus a couple of phone top-ups.

If a phone is all you ever carry, it is more bank than you need, and a lighter one will make you happier.

If a laptop travels with you, this one replaces the charger and the hunt for a free socket.

Independent testing

What the Anker 737 power bank delivers under test

Two independent reviewers put meters on this power bank. Each result below is theirs, named in full and never linked.

ChargerLab
140W held under load

Found the USB-C port sustaining its 140W single-port output under load, the claim the whole bank rests on.

TechRadar
1 to 1.5 hour recharge

Charged the bank from flat inside the advertised window when fed by a 140W USB-C wall charger.

ChargerLab + TechRadar
5A cable required

The 140W figure only appears with a PD 3.1 device and a 5A e-marked USB-C cable. A standard 60W cable silently caps output.

The headline is Power Delivery 3.1, which steps up to 28V at 5A. That 28V step is the whole trick. Older PD 3.0 banks top out at 20V/5A, which is 100W. PD 3.1’s extended power range is what lets a bank this size feed a 16-inch laptop at full tilt.

One more honest number: the 140W is a combined budget across ports, not 140W per port at the same time. Charge a laptop and a phone together and the bank splits its output. For a single-device push, it is as fast as flight-safe banks get.

Darleene, SmartGadgetKit contributor Darleene’s version: one cable, one laptop, full speed. Add a second device and the speed is shared, not doubled.
86.4Wh

The single figure that decides it for anyone who flies. The 737’s rated energy sits well under the 100Wh cabin ceiling most airlines apply, so you are carrying close to the legal maximum with laptop-grade output attached. Airlines set their own rules, so confirm with yours before you travel.

If 140W laptop charging from a bag is the job you are buying for, the evidence above is the whole argument.

amazonCheck latest price

Pass-through charging and the display

The 737 charges itself while charging your devices, so it can sit on a desk as a small overnight charging hub. Pass-through shares the same power budget, so expect slower device charging while the bank fills itself.

The OLED panel on the face reports what is going in and what is coming out. The screen is useful rather than ornamental, and Macworld reads its iPhone results straight off that display. The limit is that the display tells you rates, not the state of the cells over time, and Anker publishes no charge-cycle rating for this model.

Portability and travel use

630g and 155.7 x 54.6 x 49.5mm puts this in a bag, permanently. It is not a coat pocket item and it is not meant to be.

What the weight buys is laptop-class capacity and output in a single unit. For a working day away from the mains, the trade-off is usually worth it. For a night out, it is overkill.

The upright brick shape also helps. It sits on a cafe table without rolling, and the ports face upward where the cables fall naturally.

Darleene, SmartGadgetKit contributor
Darleene’s take My big power bank only earns its place in my bag when a laptop or an iPad is coming too. For a phone alone I would resent carrying it.

Can you take the Anker 737 on a plane?

At 86.4Wh the Anker 737 sits comfortably under the 100Wh threshold that UK CAA, EU and US rules apply to spare lithium batteries in carry-on luggage. You do not need airline approval to bring it on board.

It must travel in your hand luggage, never in checked baggage. Rules can shift and some airlines add their own limits, so confirm with your carrier before you fly.

Full rules are in our can you take a power bank on a plane? guide. Check any capacity in seconds with our mAh to Wh calculator.

Specifications

Every figure, with its source attached

Manufacturer figures are specifications or claims. Measured figures belong to the independent outlet named beside them. Nothing on this page was measured by SmartGadgetKit.

SpecificationFigureSource
Model numberA1289Anker
Cell capacity24,000mAh / 86.4WhAnker
Maximum single USB-C output140W, PD 3.1Anker, held under load in ChargerLab testing
Maximum USB-A output18WAnker
Maximum combined output140W shared across portsAnker
Input (recharge)140W via USB-C, 1 to 1.5 hoursAnker, verified by TechRadar
Dimensions and weight155.7 x 54.6 x 49.5mm, 630gAnker
DisplaySmart digital display: wattage in/out, battery health, cyclesAnker
Pass-through chargingYesAnker
In the boxPower bank, USB-C cable, documentation, 24-month warranty. No wall charger included.Anker

The 737 carries the CE and UKCA conformity markings required for the UK and EU markets. Confirm the exact certification marks on the unit and packaging when yours arrives.

If the numbers already make the case for you, the current Amazon listing is one tap away.

amazonCheck latest price

Scoring

How the Anker 737 scores

Four category scores, fixed by editorial judgement. The overall is not their average.

Charging Speed
8.5 140W out and 140W in remains a rare pairing under 100Wh, and PD 3.1 support keeps it relevant for current laptops.
Carry Rating
6.5 The weakest of the four and it deserves to be. 630g is a commitment, and no amount of output changes what it feels like in a bag at the end of a long day.
Value for Money
6.5 About fit rather than failure. With Anker’s Prime line above it and aggressive rivals beside it, the 737’s value case now leans on the discounts it regularly sees.
Port & Cable Design
7.0 Two proper USB-C ports and a useful display, set against a dated USB-A port and the unavoidable 5A cable requirement.

The overall lands at 7.0 rather than higher because the platform is ageing. It is an editorial judgement about who should buy it, not an average of the four bars above.

The verdict

It does one demanding job exceptionally well: it puts a 140W USB-C socket in your bag that airport security will not question. The display, the dual USB-C layout and the fast self-recharge all support that single purpose.

What you give up is pocketability and some future-proofing. Newer Anker banks are lighter for the capacity or more powerful overall, but they also cost more and not all of them fly as cleanly.

The easy recommendation is for anyone who charges a 14-inch or 16-inch laptop away from the wall and wants one device that handles the laptop, phone and earbuds.

140W laptop charging from a bag is the job it does properly, and it is the only job worth buying it for.

amazonCheck latest price

Should you buy it?

Where it wins, and where it costs you

Buy it if

  • You charge a USB-C laptop away from the mains
  • You fly often and want a flight-safe 86.4Wh bank
  • You want the fastest self-recharge in the category from a brand with a long safety record
  • You already carry a bag and 630g will disappear into it

Do not buy it if

  • Your heaviest device is a phone, in which case this is far more pack than you need
  • You want something that lives in a pocket
  • You want built-in cables and nothing extra to remember
  • You want the newest platform, because Anker’s Prime line has moved the flagship goalposts

Buy it if working away from sockets with a laptop is your normal, skip it if a phone is the whole job.

amazonCheck latest price

How it compares

The two products a reader is most likely weighing against it

 Anker 737 (A1289)Anker A1695Anker 87W (A1383)
Cell capacity24,000mAh / 86.4Wh25,000mAh / 90Wh20,000mAh / 72Wh
Max output140W (PD 3.1)165W total (100W per USB-C)87W total (65W single-port)
Ports2x USB-C, 1x USB-A2x USB-C, 1x USB-A, built-in cables2x USB-C, 1x USB-A, built-in cable
Weight630gHeavier than 737Lighter than 737
Flight safeYes, under 100WhYes, under 100WhYes, under 100Wh
Best for140W laptop charging from a bagTravel with built-in cables and multiple devicesOne laptop and a phone at the lowest carry weight

Rival figures come from the Anker A1289, A1695 and A1383 product pages. See our full Anker A1695 review and Anker 87W review for the deeper comparison.

If this one is not the fit

Three alternatives, three different readers

Anker 87W Power Bank (A1383)
Lighter, lower wattage

Anker 87W Power Bank (A1383)

Slightly lower peak wattage, similar capacity class, and a built-in USB-C cable. Often the smarter buy for 65W-class laptops.

Anker A1695 laptop power bank with built-in cables
Built-in cables

Anker A1695

The newer travel-first option with built-in USB-C cables, 25,000mAh and up to 165W total output. More versatile, heavier than the 737.

Baseus Blade H1 20000mAh 100W power bank
Slimmer and lighter

Baseus Blade H1 100W

A 20,000mAh/100W slab that trades the 737’s raw wattage for a much thinner shape. The better fit if your laptop tops out at 65W to 100W.

Need it to run a laptop? Compare every high-wattage pick in our laptop power banks hub.

FAQ

Questions readers ask

Is the Anker 737 any good?

Yes, for the right buyer. It is still one of the fastest 140W power banks you can fly with, and the smart display removes a lot of the guesswork. The catches are the 630g weight, the 18W USB-A port and the fact that newer Anker banks have since raised the bar.

When did the Anker 737 launch?

It launched in 2022 as part of Anker’s Series 7 line. The hardware has not changed much since, which is why it now reads as a proven workhorse rather than the newest platform.

What is the warranty on the Anker 737?

Anker backs the 737 with a 24 month warranty. Register the unit directly with Anker and keep your receipt to make a claim.

How long does the Anker 737 take to recharge from 0 to 100?

1 to 1.5 hours with a 140W USB-C wall charger, per Anker’s published spec and corroborated by TechRadar. A 65W charger roughly doubles that time.

Is the 140W output sustained or peak?

The 140W figure is the maximum combined output the bank can deliver, shared across the ports. It is not 140W per port simultaneously. On a single USB-C port with a PD 3.1 device and a 5A e-marked cable, it can sustain the full 140W. Add a second device and the budget is split.

Can I take the Anker 737 on a plane?

Yes. At 86.4Wh it is under the 100Wh carry-on limit that UK CAA, EU and US rules apply to spare lithium batteries. It must travel in hand luggage, never checked baggage, and you should still confirm with your airline before flying.

How many watt-hours is the Anker 737?

86.4Wh, calculated from its 24,000mAh capacity at the cell’s nominal voltage. That sits well under the common 100Wh airline limit.

What cable do I need to get 140W?

A USB-C cable rated for 5A with an e-marker chip, sold as 100W or 240W. A standard 60W cable silently caps the output. If you need one, our UGREEN 240W USB-C cable review covers a reliable option.

Why is my 737 losing charge overnight?

Anker’s product FAQ notes the display can drain roughly 15 percent in 24 hours if left switched on permanently. Turn the display off between checks and standby drain is minimal.

Will it charge a MacBook Pro at full speed?

Yes. A 140W-capable MacBook Pro charges at full rate over USB-C PD 3.1, provided you use a 5A e-marked cable. The display will show the real-time wattage so you can confirm it.

Anker 737 vs Anker A1695: which should I buy?

Buy the 737 if you need a single 140W port and the fastest self-recharge. Buy the A1695 if you prefer built-in cables, three USB-C ports and a 25,000mAh capacity. The A1695 is heavier, but it removes the cable hunt entirely.

Anker 737 vs Anker 87W (A1383): which is better?

The A1383 is the lighter, cheaper option for 65W-class laptops and a single phone. The 737 is the step up when you need 140W for a larger laptop or want to cut recharge time. If you do not need the extra wattage, the A1383 is the more sensible carry.

Anker 737 vs Anker Prime 26K 300W: which is the successor?

The Prime 26K 300W is the 737’s true successor: more capacity, dramatically more combined output, a newer platform. It is also a different class of purchase. If your budget stretches and you want the current flagship, that is the direction of travel, and our Anker Prime 300W review covers it in full. The 737 is the value play in the same family.

Final word

A 140W flight-safe pack that has aged well

The Anker 737 has aged the way good tools age: the numbers that made it special are still uncommon, and the compromises are still the same ones. If 140W in a bag is the job, it remains one of the safest recommendations we can make.

See how we test, or see where it ranks against the rest in our best power banks 2026 roundup.

Keep reading

Browse all our power bank guides and reviews.

Can you take a power bank on a plane?
Travel guide

Can you take a power bank on a plane?

The 2026 airline rules: watt-hour limits, how many you may carry, and in-flight use.

Best power banks 2026 guide
Best of

Best Power Banks 2026

The top picks across every size and budget, from pocket banks to laptop-class bricks.

mAh to Wh calculator guide
Tool

mAh to Wh Calculator

Convert any power bank capacity and check it against airline limits in seconds.

Tested by people who know what the numbers mean

SmartGadgetKit checks every spec against the manufacturer and independent sources, and tells you the trade-offs, not only the wins. Independent testing for this page comes from ChargerLab and TechRadar, credited where each figure appears.

Alisdair, SmartGadgetKit author
AlisdairNetwork engineer, 9 years
Darleene, SmartGadgetKit contributor
DarleeneNurse, everyday-use contributor

Tags:

SmartGadgetKit
Logo